The Chief of Staff Association (CSA) is the international professional body for chiefs of staff in corporations, governments, the military, and diplomatic corps across 45 countries. The trade association has three main priorities: to provide a world-class education to its members, to advocate on behalf of its members, and to provide a networking platform. Chief of Staff is a relatively new profession and hard to define. Trent Smyth, Chief Executive Officer of the chief of staff association, explains 'The concept was first created by the German army in the 30s and 40s, the most obvious examples are in politics - the White House - and in the military. A traditional chief of staff reports to a principal and acts on their behalf. But some have departments, and in many respects act as managers. What they do in a typical day is very different.'
The need for education
Until recently, there was very little in the way of formal education for chiefs of staff. 'We found that chiefs of staff had to settle for education that wasn’t quite designed for them - like a general leadership course,' says Trent. 'Similar occupations like law or medicine are well articulated - as are their career paths and education. We are slightly behind them in terms of training and development.'
Approaching Oxford
Trent, and the chief of staff association, set out to address this gap. In 2019, they approached Oxford University - specifically its business school - to explore a potential training programme. 'Three years ago, I had coffee with Andrew White, then associate dean for executive education. I explained my vision for what we wanted to create. Three hours later, we were still sketching out what turned into this amazing programme.'
Trent was struck by what Saïd Business School had achieved with the Corporate Affairs Academy, run in concert with Oxford University’s centre for corporate reputation. 'In many respects, the corporate affairs profession has gone through a similar journey to chiefs of staff. It was another group of people who didn't have a specific education, whose role was somewhat difficult to define, and who were leaders without formal authority. It showed us that the university had specific experience of creating programmes for emerging professions like ours.'