Skip to main content
University of Oxford Saïd Business School 25

Top menu

  • Oxford Answers

Main navigation

Main menu
  • Research
    Research
    • Research overview
      Research overview
      • Research seminars
      • Research strategy
    • Research areas
      Research areas
      • Accounting
      • Finance
      • Health Care
      • Impact
      • Innovation
      • International Business
      • Management Science
      • Marketing
      • Major Programme Management
      • Organisation Studies
      • Professional Service Firms
      • Strategy
      • Technology and Operations Management
    • Centres and initiatives
      Centres and initiatives
      • Creative Destruction Lab Oxford
      • Entrepreneurship Centre
      • Oxford Future of Finance and Technology Initiative
      • Oxford Future of Marketing Initiative
      • Oxford Future of Real Estate Initiative
      • Oxford Initiative on AI×SDGs
      • Oxford Initiative on Rethinking Performance
      • Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation
      • Oxford University Centre for Corporate Reputation
      • Private Equity Institute
      • Responsible Business
      • Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship
    • Networks
      Networks
      • CABDyN
      • Oxford Institute of Retail Management
  • Oxford experience
    Oxford experience
    • Coming to Oxford
      Coming to Oxford
      • College experience
      • Living costs
      • Partners and families
      • Visas
    • Scholarships and funding
    • Life at Oxford
      Life at Oxford
      • Learning at Oxford
      • Exploring Oxford
      • Activities, clubs and groups
      • Oxford Union
    • Blogs
    • Career development
      Career development
      • Your career journey
      • Our expertise
    • Life after Oxford
      Life after Oxford
      • Alumni
      • Elumni
  • Events
    Events
    • Events listing
    • Past events
    • Future of Business
    • Oxford Smart Space
  • About us
    About us
    • The School
      The School
      • Our history
      • Our community
      • Diversity and inclusion
      • Climate emergency
      • Rankings, achievements and accreditation
      • School Board and Global Leadership Council
      • Global Leadership Centre
      • Covid-19 information
    • Support us
      Support us
      • Fundraising priorities
      • Donate online
      • How to give
      • Corporate partnerships
      • Community giving
      • Impact and recognition
    • Our people
      Our people
      • Faculty
      • Associate Fellows
      • Academic visitors
      • Recruit our graduates
      • Work for us
    • News
      News
      • Media coverage
      • Media relations contacts
    • Venue hire
      Venue hire
      • Park End Street
      • Egrove Park
      • B&B accommodation at Egrove Park
      • Our services
  • Programmes
    Programmes
    • MBAs
      MBAs
      • MBA
      • 1+1 MBA
      • Executive MBA
    • Degrees
      Degrees
      • BA Economics and Management
      • DPhil Finance
      • DPhil Management
      • MSc Financial Economics
      • MSc Global Healthcare Leadership
      • MSc Law and Finance
      • MSc Major Programme Management
    • Executive Diplomas
      Executive Diplomas
      • Artificial Intelligence for Business
      • Financial Strategy
      • Global Business
      • Organisational Leadership
      • Strategy and Innovation
    • Executive Education
      Executive Education
      • On-campus open programmes
      • Online programmes
      • ​Custom programmes
    • Programme finder
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Chatbots get the blame if they look too human
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Chatbots get the blame if they look too human
''

Chatbots get the blame if they look too human

Thu, 18th November 2021

Published


Related news

  • Research

Latest FOMI's study on humanised chatbots

When customers are angry, humanlike chatbots could make them even angrier with a negative effect on customer satisfaction and brand reputation.

This is the result of a study carried out by a research team at the Oxford Future of Marketing Initiative (FOMI) at Said Business School.

The study, published in the Journal of Marketing, is titled “Blame the Bot: Anthropomorphism and Anger in Customer-Chatbot Interactions” and is authored by L’Oréal Professor of Marketing Andrew Stephen, and Associate Professors of Marketing Cammy Crolic, Felipe Thomaz and Rhonda Hadi.

Chatbots are increasingly replacing human customer-service agents on companies’ websites, social media pages, and messaging services. Designed to mimic humans, these bots often have human names (e.g., Amazon’s Alexa), humanlike appearances (e.g., avatars), and the capability to converse like humans. The assumption is that having human qualities makes chatbots more effective in customer service roles.

However, FOMI’s research team demonstrated that humanised chatbots raise unrealistic expectations of how helpful they will be. This can increase the frustration in customers who are angry when they shop, whereas there is no significant impact on customers who are in a neutral mood.

The research was conducted through five studies in which the team analysed nearly 35,000 chat sessions and tested hundreds of participants in mock- customer service scenarios or in simulated conversations with humanised chatbots.

A final study where the humanlike chatbot explicitly lowered customers’ expectations before the chat demonstrated that when people no longer had unrealistic expectations of how helpful the humanlike chatbot would be, the response from angry customers is no longer negative.

Professor Andrew Stephen, Director of FOMI, said: “The emotional state of consumers when they shop is a factor that cannot be underestimated. People often shop to lift their mood after a bad day. If they encounter any issue in their customer journey, they expect the friendly customer service advisor on the other side to have the problem-solving skills to help them satisfy their needs. Chatbots, as much as humanised they can be, haven’t got that level of human sophistication, yet.

“Our findings present a clear roadmap for how best to deploy chatbots when dealing with hostile, angry or complaining customers. It is important for marketers to carefully design chatbots and consider the context in which they are used, particularly when it comes to handling customer complaints or resolving problems.”

FOMI recommendations include:

  • Assessing first whether a customer is angry before they enter the chat (e.g., via natural language processing) and then deploying the most effective (either humanlike or not humanlike) chatbot. If the customer is not angry, assign a humanlike chatbot; but if the customer is angry, assign a non-humanlike chatbot.
  • Where a customised chatbot strategy is not technically feasible, assigning as a default non-humanlike chatbots in customer service situations where customers tend to be angry, such as complaint centres.
  • Where humanlike chatbots are the only option, downplaying the capabilities of humanlike chatbots (e.g., Slack’s chatbot introduces itself by saying “I try to be helpful. But I’m still just a bot. Sorry!” or “I am not a human. Just a bot, a simple bot, with only a few tricks up my metaphorical sleeve!”).

Related news

  • Research

Footer menu

  • Contact us
  • Find us
  • Press
  • Jobs
  • Website policies
  • Alumni
  • Donate
  • Covid-19

Follow us

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • WeChat
  • Blogs
  • Advance HE Opens in new tab
  • EFMD Equis accreditations Opens in new tab
  • Global Network for Advanced Management Opens in new tab

Website & Privacy Policies © Saïd Business School 2023 All rights reserved

Back to top